The first chapters of the book describe the history of Ellis Island, and its role in American history. After reading the first
two sentences of the book, we have already learned that Ellis Island is a "treshold of liberty" and "the symbolic shrine to
freedom and opportunity". The first half of the book is filled with similar platitudes.
The author seems to be more interested in reinforcing romantic prejudices than in factual correctness. An example is name
changes at Ellis Island. "Names were often a problem", writes Ms. Szucs. "Not all immigrants could spell their names, and baffled
officials jotted down names as they sounded." Those officials handled thousands of immigrants, and it would take more than a
foreign-sounding name to "baffle" them. Dick Eastman discussed the improbability of name changes at Ellis Island in his article
Name Changes at Ellis Island: Fact or Fiction? (May 2001).
His main arguments were the translators and interpreters employed by Ellis Island, the documents immigrants had to hand over, and
the ships' passenger lists that would list their names. Ms. Szucs should have known better.
Another myth that the author reinforces but should have debunked is the "ocean journey that could last several months".
The era of Ellis Island was also the era of steam ships. It took the ships of the Holland America Line ten days to get from
Rotterdam to Ellis Island. Maybe the ocean journey "could last several months", in practice less than a couple of weeks was more
likely. (Actually, it took the Mayflower two months and five days to get from Plymouth to Cape Cod in 1620, 272 years before Ellis
Later chapters are more down to earth, giving practical, useful (albeit terse) information on tracing immigrant ancestors
(not limited to Ellis Island).
Was this information useful to you? Did you miss anything? Do you have corrections, additions, or a remark about this page? Or
do you have an entirely different opinion about the reviewed book? Please take a moment to add your thoughts to the